Belongs within: Orioloidea.
The Oriolidae, orioles, are forest-dwelling birds found in tropical and subtropical regions of the Old World. They are starling-sized birds from eight to twelve inches in length, with short fine bristles concealing the nostrils. The wings have ten primary feathers, and the tails have twelve feathers (Austin 1961). Males of many species are boldly coloured with the name ‘oriole’ derived from the golden colour of the type species Oriolus oriolus.
Orioles: the genuine article
Published 29 April 2015
It is widely appreciated that the British during the age of exploration were probably not the most imaginative of baptisers. Thanks to their tendency to label the fauna of foreign lands with the names of familiar animals back home, we are regularly confronted with warblers that aren’t warblers, cod that aren’t cod, monkeys that aren’t monkeys. And for years, many an American has laboured under the mistaken impression that they know what an oriole is. This post is about the real orioles.
The Oriolidae are a family of birds found mostly in the tropics of the Old World, from Africa to Australia. Only a few species in the family are known from temperate climes. One of these is the original oriole, the European Oriolus oriolus, which migrates between sub-Saharan Africa and its breeding range in Europe and central Asia. The name ‘oriole’ is derived from the Latin word for ‘golden’, and there is no question of this being an appropriate name for the European bird. The male’s plumage is almost entirely golden yellow, with the wings being black. As is commonly the way with birds, the females are less dramatic, being predominantly green. Despite the males’ bright coloration, though, orioles are by all accounts fairly retiring birds, usually remaining secluded in the tree canopy, where they seek out fruit and small insects.
The majority of the about thirty remaining species of Oriolus are also some combination of gold, green and/or black, but there are notable exceptions. A clade of Australo-Papuan and Moluccan species, identified by Jønsson et al. (2010) as the sister group to the other Oriolus species, contains relatively dull brown or greenish species. The Moluccan species in this clade bear a strong resemblance to friarbirds, a group of honeyeaters found in the same region, to the extent that the black-eared oriole Oriolus bouroensis was first described as a friarbird. It has been suggested that this represents a case of mimicry with the retiring orioles gaining a degree of protection from their resemblance to the aggressive friarbirds (Dickinson 2004). Another Asian clade identified by Jønsson et al. (2010) includes mostly red and black species. It also includes the silver oriole Oriolus mellianus in which the red coloration has been mostly lost, so that it is mostly silver-white with a black head and wings.
Also included in the Oriolidae are the three species of figbird in the genus Sphecotheres, found in the Australo-Papuan region. The figbirds, as their name suggests, have a higher proportion of fruit in their diet than orioles. They are also more sociable, living in small flocks. Figbirds are distinguished from orioles by the presence of patches of bright red bare skin around their eyes; they are otherwise a dull greenish colour. Recent studies have also indicated oriolid affinities for Pitohui, a genus of two red and black birds, the hooded pitohui P. dichrous and variable pitohui P. kirhocephalus, found in New Guinea. Previous authors have included six species in Pitohui, but phylogenetic studies have revealed that the genus in the broad sense is widely polyphyletic, with the remaining species belonging to different bird families. The red and black markings of the ‘pitohuis’ are a case of aposematic coloration, advertising that its bearer is toxic. The pitohuis contain batrachotoxins in their skin and feathers, a similar substance to that found in the poison-arrow frogs of South America. Contrary to what you may read elsewhere, the pitohuis were not the first known case of toxicity in birds, though it was one of the most definite ones. It has been known since ancient times that migratory quail Coturnix coturnix are toxic at certain points on their migratory route: the biblical book of Numbers describes a case of mass poisoning suffered by the Israelites during the exodus. Other examples of birds that are at least seasonally toxic include the spur-winged goose Plectropterus gambensis and the bronzewing pigeons of the genus Phaps (a brief review of bird toxicity is provided by Bartram & Boland, 2001). As far as is known, all cases of toxicity in birds result from feeding on something containing the relevant toxic substance (probably beetles, in the case of pitohuis) which is then sequestered by the bird.
The Australo-Papuan distribution of these two genera, together with the basal position of the Australo-Papuan species in the genus Oriolus, suggests that the family originated in this area before crossing the Wallace Line to diversify in Eurasia and Africa (Jønsson et al. 2010). An Australo-Papuan origin for the orioles also correlates with the presence of a fossil oriolid, Longmornis robustirostrata, in the early Miocene Riversleigh deposit of Australia (Boles 1999). It also correlates with the recent identification as oriolids of the now extinct New Zealand piopios of the genus Turnagra (Zuccon & Ericson 2012). The piopios were two species (the South Island piopio Turnagra capensis and the North Island T. tanagra) of mostly brown songbirds, also commonly known as the New Zealand thrushes. Their song was described as being amongst the most beautiful of any New Zealand bird, both complex and with a propensity towards mimicking other birds. Though seemingly common at the time of European settlement, they declined rapidly and probably became extinct around the start of the 20th Century. The affinities of the piopios were long contentious, with leading suggestions including a relationship with the whistlers of the Pachycephalidae, or with the bowerbirds of the Ptilonorhynchidae. Zuccon & Ericson (2012) marshalled an array of molecular, morphological and behavioural evidence in favour of a relationship with the orioles, though this stands in contrast with an earlier molecular study that supported the bowerbird hypothesis (Zuccon & Ericson noted that the cytochrome b sequence reported in the earlier study did not correspond with the one they found themselves, and suggested that it may have been the result of contamination). The dull coloration of the piopios compared to other orioles was explained by Zuccon & Ericson as a loss of sexual dimorphism, but this may have been unnecessary: they seem to have overlooked the similarly dull coloration of a number of other basal oriolids. The fact that the piopios were described as more terrestrial than the other oriolids is also not unusual in the New Zealand context. After all, the New Zealand bird fauna is famed for its tendency towards terrestrialisation (it even included a terrestrial owlet-nightjar!) In an environment where the main threat came from above in the form of birds of prey, the ground must have seemed like a welcoming place to be.
Systematics of Oriolidae
<==Oriolidae
|--PitohuiBKB15
| |--P. cerviniventrisAP21
| |--P. dichrousBKB15
| |--P. kirhocephalusBKB15
| `--P. uropygialisAP21
`--+--+--Longmornis Boles 1999B99
| | `--*L. robustirostrata Boles 1999B99
| |--Sphecotheres Vieillot 1816BKB15, B94 [Sphecotheridae]
| | |--S. flaviventrisT62 [=S. viridis flaviventrisM03; incl. S. viridis ashbyiM03]
| | |--S. hypoleucusJT12
| | |--S. vieillotiBKB15 [=S. viridis vieillotiM03]
| | `--S. viridis Vieillot 1816PB96
| `--Turnagra Lesson 1837ZE12, CC10 (see below for synonymy)
| |--T. capensis (Sparrman 1787) [=Tanagra capensis]CC10
| | |--T. c. capensis (see below for synonymy)CC10
| | `--T. c. minor Fleming 1915CC10
| `--T. tanagra (Schlegel 1865) (see below for synonymy)CC10
`--Oriolus Linné 1766BKB15, B94 [incl. Analcipus Swainson 1831B94; Analcipodidae]
| i. s.: O. baltimoreus [=Zanthornus baltimoreus]J23
| O. ceylonensisW66
| O. cochinsinensisS89
| O. crassirostrisJT12
| O. decipiensAP21
| O. diffusus Sharpe 1877 [incl. O. indicus Oat. 1883]S89
| O. galbulaD66
| O. galbuloidesV41
| O. kundooAP21
| O. melanocephalusS89
| O. tenuirostrisJT12
|--O. mellianusJT12
`--+--+--O. phaeochromusJT12
| `--+--+--O. bouroensisJT12
| | `--O. forsteniJT12
| `--+--O. sagittatus (Latham 1801)BKB15, WS48 [=Coracias sagittataWS48]
| | |--O. s. sagittatusM03
| | |--O. s. affinis Gould 1848 [incl. O. sagittatus blaauwi Mathews 1912]WS48
| | `--O. s. magnirostris [incl. O. s. grisescens]M03
| `--+--O. flavocinctus (Vigors 1826)BKB15, WS48 (see below for synonymy)
| `--+--O. melanotisJT12
| `--O. szalayiBKB15
`--+--+--+--O. trailliiBKB15 [=Analcipus trailliS89]
| | `--+--O. cruentusJT12
| | `--O. hosiiJT12
| `--+--O. xanthonotusBKB15
| `--+--O. steeriiJT12
| `--+--O. albilorisJT12
| `--O. isabellaeJT12
`--+--+--O. xanthornusBKB15
| `--+--O. brachyrhynchusBKB15
| |--O. chlorocephalusJT12
| `--O. cruentusBKB15
`--+--+--O. auratusBKB15
| `--+--O. chinensisBKB15
| | |--O. c. chinensisR02
| | `--O. c. sanghirensisR02
| `--O. oriolusBKB15
`--+--O. monacha (Gmelin 1789)JT12, S05 [incl. O. moloxita Rüppell 1835S05]
`--+--O. larvatus Lichtenstein 1823BKB15, ICZN96 [incl. O. africanus Wilkes 1820 (nom. rej.)ICZN96]
`--+--O. nigripennisBKB15
`--O. percivaliJT12
Oriolus flavocinctus (Vigors 1826)BKB15, WS48 [=Mimetes flavocinctusWS48; incl. O. flavocinctus parryi Mathews 1912WS48]
Turnagra Lesson 1837ZE12, CC10 [incl. Ceropia Sundevall 1857CC10, Keropia Gray 1840CC10, Otagon Bonaparte 1851CC10; Keropiidae, Turnagridae]
Turnagra capensis capensis (Sparrman 1787) [incl. Turdus crassirostris Gmelin 1789, *Ceropia crassirostris, *Keropia crassirostris, Otagon crassirostris, Turnagra crassirostris, Campephaga ferruginea Vieillot 1817, Tanagra macularia Quoy & Gaimard in Dumont d’Urville 1830, *Turnagra macularia, Loxia turdus Forster in Lichtenstein 1844, *Otagon turdus, Turnagra turdus]CC10
Turnagra tanagra (Schlegel 1865) [=Otagon tanagra, Keropia tanagra, Turnagra capensis tanagra; incl. T. hectori Buller 1869]CC10
*Type species of generic name indicated
References
[AP21] Arlott, N., & B. van Perlo. 2021. Collins Birds of the World. William Collins.
Austin, O. L., Jr. 1961. Birds of the World: A survey of the twenty-seven orders and one hundred and fifty-five families. Paul Hamlyn: London.
Bartram, S., & W. Boland. 2001. Chemistry and ecology of toxic birds. ChemBioChem 2: 809–811.
[B94] Bock, W. J. 1994. History and nomenclature of avian family-group names. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 222: 1–281.
[B99] Boles, W. E. 1999. A new songbird (Aves: Passeriformes: Oriolidae) from the Miocene of Riversleigh, northwestern Queensland, Australia. Alcheringa 23: 51–56.
[BKB15] Burleigh, J. G., R. T. Kimball & E. L. Braun. 2015. Building the avian tree of life using a large-scale, sparse supermatrix. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 84: 53–63.
[CC10] Checklist Committee (OSNZ). 2010. Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica 4th ed. Ornithological Society of New Zealand and Te Papa Press: Wellington.
Dickinson, E. C. 2004. Systematic notes on Asian birds. 42. A preliminary review of the Oriolidae. Zool. Verh. Leiden 350: 47–63.
[D66] Dohrn, H. 1866. Synopsis of the birds of Ilha do Principe, with some remarks on their habits and descriptions of new species. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1866: 324–332.
[ICZN96] ICZN. 1996. Nine specific names of southern Afrotropical birds conserved. Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 53: 292–294.
[J23] James, E. 1823. Account of an Expedition from Pittsburgh to the Rocky Mountains, performed in the years 1819 and ’20, by order of the Hon. J. C. Calhoun, sec’y of war: under the command of Major Stephen H. Long. From the notes of Major Long, Mr. T. Say, and other gentlemen of the exploring party vol. 1. H. C. Carey & I. Lea: Philadelphia.
[JT12] Jetz, W., G. H. Thomas, J. B. Joy, K. Hartmann & A. Ø. Mooers. 2012. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491: 444–448.
Jønsson, K. A., R. C. K. Bowie, R. G. Moyle, M. Irestedt, L. Christidis, J. A. Norman & J. Fjeldsa. 2010. Phylogeny and biogeography of Oriolidae (Aves: Passeriformes). Ecography 33: 232–241.
[M03] Morcombe, M. 2003. Field Guide to Australian Birds 2nd ed. Steve Parish Publishing.
[PB96] Palma, R. L., & S. C. Barker. 1996. Phthiraptera. In: Wells, A. (ed.) Zoological Catalogue of Australia vol. 26. Psocoptera, Phthiraptera, Thysanoptera pp. 81–247. CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.
[R02] Riley, J. 2002. Population sizes and the status of endemic and restricted-range bird species on Sangihe Island, Indonesia. Bird Conservation International 12: 53–78.
[S89] Salvadori, T. 1889. Viaggio di Leonardo Fea nella Birmania e nelle regioni vicine. XIX.—Uccelli raccolti nei Monti Carin a nord-est di Tounghoo, nel Pegù presso Rangoon e Tounghoo e nel Tenasserim presso Malewoon. Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Genova, Serie 2a, 7: 369–438.
[S05] Steinheimer, F. D. 2005. Eduard Rüppel’s avian types at the Natural History Museum, Tring (Aves). Senckenbergiana Biologica 85 (2): 233–264.
[T62] Tendeiro, J. 1962. Estudos sobre malófagos: revisão monográfica do género Columbicola Ewing (Ischnocera, Philopteridae). Memórias da Junta de Investigações do Ultramar, ser. 2, 32: 7–460.
[V41] Vigne, G. T. 1841. Relating to a collection of birds formed in Thibet and Cashmere. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 9: 6–7.
[W66] Walden, A. 1866. Notes on birds collected in Tennasserim and in the Andaman Islands. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1866: 537–556.
[WS48] Whittell, H. M., & D. L. Serventy. 1948. A systematic list of the birds of Western Australia. Public Library, Museum and Art Gallery of Western Australia, Special Publication 1: 1–126.
[ZE12] Zuccon, D., & P. G. P. Ericson. 2012. Molecular and morphological evidences place the extinct New Zealand endemic Turnagra capensis in the Oriolidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 414–426.